Understanding is associated with being in the picture.
How do you usually picture problematic patterns of human behaviour?
How do you interpret the meaning of very necessary news and Very Necessary News?
How have you already interpreted the words, images and imagery here?
When are words necessary in conveying accurate meanings and when are they unnecessary?
How do you interpret the words associated with the Civility Party of Australia?
How do images, including mental images and imaginings, influence your interpretations of words, societies, communities, organisations, people and events?
In figurative terms, it is the opposite of being in the dark.
Perhaps you are seeking to provide enlightened patronage of Civility Today and/or Very Necessary News.
Perhaps you are seeking membership of the Civility Party of Australia or the global Mozarty Party.
Perhaps you are seeking to know more about historical linguistics and/or the possible future meaning of particular words, phrases, past events, current events and various compositions.
In multicultural societies, and multilingual ones, and excessively hierarchical ones, and inadequately democratic ones, and inadequately educated ones, confusion about meanings is likely to be prevalent.
How do you know whether a person, a group, a culture or an organisation has dominance or not?
What are the causes of dominance?
What are the causes of submissiveness.
What are the causes of freedom?
How, if at all, do you attempt to uphold the dignity of a culture without diminishing the dignity of other cultures?
How do you decide whether a culture is associated with aggression more than it is associated with peace, freedom and dignity?
Perhaps you have been comparing advice.
Perhaps you are worried about your safety or the safety of someone else.
Very Necessary News is associated with the encouragement of accurate comparisons, and accurate interpretations.
Perhaps you are mostly interested in comparing lexicons.
Perhaps you are mostly interested in comparing images.
Perhaps you are mostly interested in comparing sounds.
Perhaps you are mostly interested in comparing documents.
Perhaps you are mostly interested in comparing political organisations and/or news organisations and/or artistic practices and/or the present with the past.
To practice the art of very necessary news is to tell the truth with appropriate sensitivity, relevance and timeliness.
When people are in the picture, they are adequately aware of relevant information.
History has often been shaped by violent incidents and misinterpretations of intentions.
Perhaps you have difficulty distinguishing between the words denotation, detonation, connotation, designation, destination, resignation, proposition and preposition.
Perhaps you are interested in calligraphy and/or typography.
Perhaps you are interested in topography and/or cartography.
Perhaps you are interested in comparing necessary news with trivia, intrusions of privacy, expressions of fake news and the prevalence of propaganda.
Perhaps you are interested in investigating the activist and artistic aspects of satire.
Perhaps you regard yourself as an artivist and/or archivist and/or anarchist.
Perhaps you are interested in the colophons and drolleries of codices.
Perhaps you are interested in lexicography and/or lexicology.
Perhaps you are interested in the psychology of curiosity.
How do you assess your own curiosity?
Perhaps you are interested in vexillology and/or vexillography.
Perhaps you are interested in communication design more generally.
What do you know about the history of heraldry and its societal and political relationship to the history of mainstream media?
How do you know when politicians and/or journalists are playing games with the public?
What is your acquaintance with the ethology of politics and journalism?
How do you define politics in terms of motivation and behaviour?
How do you define journalism in terms of motivation and behaviour?
How do you define art in terms of motivation and behaviour?
How do you compare illuminated manuscripts composed and compiled before and after the Black Death?
What is happening in the world now, and how do you know?
What is happening in your immediate vicinity?
What is happening in your mind, and particularly within your imagination, your curiosity and your emotions?
Perhaps you have been comparing Very Necessary News with Necessary Ethics.
Where do you usually obtain important information about policy and politics?
How do you usually compare the quality of informational sources?
Few people actively practice political philanthropy with consistent credibility.
Few people actively practice public interest journalism with consistent credibility.
Very Necessary News expresses political philanthropy through public interest journalism, the social sciences and historiography.
How does your interpretation of the past influence your interpretation of recent and ongoing events, and possibly even the future?
How are your perceptions and interpretations of events influenced by advertising, infotainment, soft media, social media, popular culture, sensationalism, and adpositional phrases?
If you are quite well acquainted with English prepositions, you may also be well acquainted with preposterous politics as practiced through the English language and various other languages.
What has history taught you about research?
What has history taught you about journalists?
What is your acquaintance with repetition as a rhetorical device?
What is your acquaintance with the use of repetition in advertising campaigns, including political campaigns?
What is your acquaintance with slogans?
You may associate being in the picture with being aware of important information.
What does being knowledgeable mean to you?
Perhaps you are an advanced practitioner of the enlightened being of political kindness.
Perhaps you regard yourself as a compiler of chronicles relating to the Social Media Quadrangle.
Perhaps you regard yourself as a student of an unusual grimoire.
Perhaps you regard yourself as an expert on the Luttrell Psalter and/or Eleanor crosses and/or very necessary news.
Perhaps you know the historical significance, and ongoing significance, of the Latin term Ubi sunt.
If you are in the picture about politics, whether in Australia or anywhere else, are you also in the loop as an insider or outsider?
Perhaps you think most people behave like sheep.
How do you know whether you are any different?
You may regard most events, documents and images from the past as irrelevant to you.
How do you know whether anyone's curiosity is based on accurate assumptions rather than irrational impulses?
Many irrational impulses are associated with the urge to seek thrills, whether through a sense of adventure, political ambition or greed.
How do you identify criminal actions, or otherwise objectionable behaviours?
How do you address wrongdoing?
How do you encourage political pleasantness and societal peace?
From whom do you prefer to seek advice, and when?
To whom do you prefer to ask questions, and why?
Perhaps you usually experience tabloid news and pseudoscience rather than quality news and real science.
How do you usually assess linguistic cohesion and coherence?
How do you usually assess literal and figurative language?
How do you usually assess abstract art and abstract reasoning?
Perhaps you regard texts as being much the same as abstract art if you cannot understand them.
How do you interpret and communicate purportedly traditional practices and the scandals associated with them?
How do you identify evidence of social change and seek to assess its causes and consequences?
How do you interpret transitions of various sorts, whether they are apparently inevitable or seemingly unexpected?
You may associate political transitions with the relatively peaceful transfer of power and/or with civil wars.
What do you know about linguistic transitions?
Perhaps you have been examining digital documents from that time.
Perhaps you have been examining and comparing evidence of ruthlessness from various times and places.
Are most powerful people, of all places and times in history, and regardless of gender, much the same as the Dark Lords of fiction?
What prevents those people from serving the public interest?
Why does so much dumbing down happen?
Who is afraid of the analysis of facts, and why?
What do you know about the importance of the Luttrell Psalter?
If you are an Australian voter, what have you discovered about the Liberals, Labor, the National Party and LNP, the Greens, One Nation, the Really Quite Pleasant Australian Political Organisation, the Naturals, the Civility Party, the Mozarty Party, the LobbyRule Party and LayBore?
And how do you picture democracy?
